alignment with the permanent instability and transformation (in organizational structures, workflows, information technologies, and societal relations) that we are experiencing in our information-driven society. RGS and the notion of intertextuality, with all its nuances, may help develop more flexible, human-centred approaches to records and archives. archives in liquid times Literature Allen, G. (2011). Intertextuality (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. Andersen, J. (2008). The concept of genre in information studies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42(1), 339-367. Andersen, J. (2015). Re-describing knowledge organization: A genre and activity-based view. In J. Andersen (ed.), Genre theory in information studies (pp. 13-42) Studies in Information, 11, London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Artemeva, N. (2006). Approaches to learning genres: A bibliographical essay. In N. Artemeva A. Freedman (Eds.), Rhetorical genre studies and beyond (pp. 9-99). Winnipeg, MB: Inkshed Publications. Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In A. Freedman P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79-101). London: Taylor Francis. Bazerman, C. (2000). Letters and the social grounding of differentiated genres. In D. Barton N. Hall (Eds.), Letter writing as a social practice (pp. 15-29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Chen, Y. (2010). Documenting transitional information in EMR. In J. A. Konstan, E. Chi, K. Höök (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 10-15, Atlanta, USA (pp. 1787-1796). New York: ACM Press. Christensen, L.R. (2016). On intertext in chemotherapy: An ethnography of text in medical practice. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 25, 1-38. Culler, J. (1982). On deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Darwin, C. (1832). Letter to Caroline Darwin, Botafogo Bay, 25-26 April, 1832. Darwin Correspondence Project, Letter no. 166, retrieved from http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/DCP- LETT-166 Devitt, A. (1991). Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential, and functional. In C. Bazerman J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamic of the professions (pp. 336-357). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. Douglas, J. (2010). Origins: Evolving ideas about the principle of provenance. In T. Eastwood H. MacNeil (Eds.), Currents of archival thinking (pp. 23-43). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited. Duranti, L. (1997). The archival bond. Archives and Museum Informatics, 11, 213-218. Duranti, L. (1989). Diplomatics: New uses for an old science. Archivaria, 28(Summer), 7-27. Duranti, L. (1989-90). Diplomatics: New uses for an old science (Part II). Archivaria, 29(Winter), 4-17. Flinn, A. (2007). Community histories, community archives: Some opportunities and challenges. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 28(2), 151-176 Flinn, A. (2008). Other ways of thinking, other ways of being. Documenting the margins and the transitory: What to preserve, how to collect. In L. Craven (Ed.), What are archivesCultural and theoretical perspectives (pp. 109-128). Aldershot: Ashgate. Flinn, A., Stevens, M., Shepherd, E. (2009). 'Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream. Archival Science, 9(1-2), 71-86. 192 fiorella foscarini and juan ilerbaig intertextuality in the archives Foscarini, F. (2012). Diplomatics and genre theory as complementary approaches. Archival Science, 12(4), 389-409. Foscarini, F. (2014). A genre-based investigation of workplace communities. Archivaria, 78, 1-24. Foscarini, F. (2015). Organizational records as genres: An analysis of the 'documentary reality' of organizations from the perspectives of diplomatics, records management, and rhetorical genre studies. In J. Andersen (ed.), Genre theory in information studies (pp. 115-32) Studies in Information 11, London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Ilerbaig, J. (forthcoming). Instruments of recollection: Field notes, place, and memory in the practice of Darwin's natural history. Unpublished manuscript. InterPARES. (2001). The Long-term Preservation of Authentic Electronic Records: Findings of the InterPARESProject. Retrieved from http://interpares.org/book/index.cfm MacNeil, H. (1992). The context is all: Describing a fonds and its parts in accordance with the Rules for Archival Description. In T. Eastwood (Ed.), The archival fonds: From theory to practice (pp. 195-225). Ottawa: Bureau of Canadian Archivists. MacNeil, H. (2004). Contemporary archival diplomatics as a method of inquiry: Lessons learned from two research projects. Archival Science, 4, 199-232. MacNeil, H. (2015). The role of calendars in constructing a community of historical workers in the Public Records Office of Great Britain ca. 1850s-1950s. In J. Andersen (ed.), Genre theory in information studies (pp. 91-113) Studies in Information, 11, London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. McKemmish, S. (2005). Traces: Document, record, archive, archives. In S. McKemmish, M. Piggott, B. Reed, F. Upward (Eds.), Archives: Recordkeeping in society (pp. 1-20). Wagga Wagga, NSW: Charles Sturt University, Centre for Information Studies. McKenzie, P.J. Davies, E. (2012). Genre systems and 'keeping track' in everyday life. Archival Science, 12(4), 437-60. Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151-167. Miller, C. (1994). Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. In A. Freedman P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 57-66). London: Taylor Francis. Oliver, G. (2008). Information culture: Exploration of different values and attitudes to information in organisations. Journal of Documentation, 64(3), 363-385. Oliver, G., Foscarini, F. (2013). Records management and information culture: Tackling the people problem. London: Facet. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations." Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427. 0sterlund, C. (2007). Genre combinations: A window into dynamic communication practices. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 81-108. 0sterlund, C. (2008). Documents in place: Demarcating places for collaboration in healthcare settings. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 17, 195-225. Paré, A. (2002). Genre and identity: Individuals, institutions and ideology. In R. Coe, L. Lingard, T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and change (pp. 57-71). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. Pearce-Moses, R. (2005). A glossary of archival and records terminology. Chicago: The Society of American Archivists. Russell, D. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An Activity Theory Analysis. Written Communication, 14(4), 504-54. Schryer, C.F. (1994). Records as genre. Written Communication, 10(2), 200-234. Smart, G. (2006). Writing the economy: Activity, genre and technology in the world of banking. Oakville, CT: Equinox. 193

Periodiekviewer Koninklijke Vereniging van Archivarissen

Jaarboeken Stichting Archiefpublicaties | 2017 | | pagina 98