archives in liquid times
Cooren, F. (2004). Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings.
Organization, 11, 373-393.
Cornelius, I. (2014). Epistemological challenges for information science. In F. Ibekwe-SanJuan
T.M. Dousa (Eds.), Theories of information, communication and knowledge. Dordrecht:
Springer.
Currie, G. (2004). Arts and minds. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Derrida, J. (1988). Limited inc. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Derrida, J. (1996). Archive fever: A Freudian impression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Derrida, J. (2002). Without alibi. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Derrida, J. (2007). A certain impossible possibility of saying the event. Critical Inquiry, 33,
441-461.
Doty, K.L., Hiltunen, R. (2009). Formulaic discourse and speech acts in the witchcraft trial
records of Salem, 1692. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 458-469.
Dourish, P. (2004). What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous
Computing, 8, 19-30.
Dreyfus, H.L., Rabinow, P. (1983). MichelFoucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Duranti, L. (1991/2). Brothman on authorship: The diplomatic perspective. Archivaria, 33,
Duranti, L. (1997). The archival bond. Archives and Museum Informatics, 11, 213-218.
Duranti, L. (1998). Diplomatics: New uses for an old science. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.
Duranti, L. (2005). The long-term preservation of authentic electronic records: Findings of the
InterPARESproject. San Miniato: Archilab.
Duranti, L. (2010). Diplomatics. In M.J. Bates M.N. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library
and information sciences (3rd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Duranti, L., Preston, R. (Eds.) (2008). International research on permanent authentic records in
electronic systems (InterPARES 2). Padua: Universita di Padova.
Eastwood, T. (1993). How goes it with appraisal? Archivaria, 36, 111-121.
Eastwood, T. (2017). A contested realm: The nature of archives and the orientation of archival
science. In H. MacNeil T. Eastwood (Eds.) Currents of archival thinking (2nd ed.). Santa
Barbara: Libraries Unlimited.
Eppinger, M. (2013). Sages, savages, and other speech act communities. Saint Louis University
Law Journal, 57, 407-428.
Ferraris, M. (2013). Documentality: Why it is necessary to leave traces. New York: Fordham
University.
Financial Conduct Authority (ca.2015). Records management principles. Retrieved from
https://www.fca.org.uk/static/documents/foi/records-management-principles.pdf
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this classCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fish, S. (1999). Reflections on Austin and Derrida. In H. Aram Veeser (Ed.), The Stanley Fish
reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
Floersch, J. (2000). Reading the case record: The oral and written narratives of social workers.
Social Service Review, 74, 169-192.
Floridi, L. (2004). Information. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to the philosophy of
computing and information. Oxford: Blackwell.
Foscarini, F. (2013). Record as social action: Understanding organizational records through
the lens of genre theory. Information Research, 18(3). Retrieved from http://InformationR.net/
ir/18-3/colis/paperC08.html
Foscarini, F. (2014). A genre-based investigation of workplace communities. Archivaria, 78,
1-24.
114
geoffrey yeo information, records, and the philosophy of speech acts
Fotion, N. (2000). John Searle. Teddington: Acumen.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock Publications.
Furner, J. (2014). Information without information studies. In F. Ibekwe-SanJuan
T.M. Dousa (Eds.), Theories of information, communication and knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer.
Gardiner, M. (1992). The dialogics of critique: M. M. Bakhtin and the theory of ideology. London:
Routledge.
Gilliland, A.J. (2014). Reconceptualizing records, the archive and archival roles and
requirements in a networked society. Knygotyra, 63, 17-34.
Gitelman, L. (Ed.) (2013). 'Raw data' is an oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gumperz, J.J. (2009). The speech community. In A. Duranti (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology.
Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hamm, J. (2011). Unusually excellent: The necessary nine skills required for the practice of great
leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hancher, M. (1979). The classification of cooperative illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 8,
1-14.
Hanks, P. (2015). Propositional content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harmer, F.E. (1952). Anglo-Saxon writs. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Hennig, B. (2014). Documents: Fillers of informational gaps. TheMonist, 97, 246-255.
Henttonen, P. (2007). Records, rules and speech acts. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Henttonen, P. (2017). Looking at archival concepts and practice in the light of speech act
theory. In A.J. Gilliland, S. McKemmish, A.J. Lau (Eds.), Research in the Archival Multiverse.
Clayton, VIC: Monash University Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_628143
Horsman, P. (2011). Wrapping records in narratives: Representing context through archival
description. Retrieved from https://www.its-arolsen.org/fileadmin/user_upload/
Metanavigation/Aktuelles/2011_PDF/04_Horsman_text.pdf
Hume, D. (1740). A treatise of human nature, vol.3. London: Thomas Longman.
Iacovino, L. (1998). The nature of the nexus between recordkeeping and the law. Archives and
Manuscripts, 26, 216-246.
Iacovino, L. (2005). Recordkeeping and juridical governance. In S. McKemmish, M. Piggott,
B. Reed, F. Upward (Eds.), Archives: Recordkeeping in society. Wagga Wagga: Charles Sturt
University.
ISO15489-1:2016. Records management. Part 1: Concepts and principles.
Jordan, R.L., Warren, W.D., Walt, S.D. (2000). Negotiable instruments, payments, and credits
(5th ed.). St Paul: Foundation Press.
Kosur, J. (2015). CFOs need to define a 'single source oftruth' for all of their business needs.
Retrieved from http://uk.businessinsider.com/cfos-need-to-define-the-single-source-of-
truth-2015-10
Kurzon, D. (1986). It is hereby performed: Explorations in legal speech acts. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Latham, K.F. (2011). Medium rare: Exploring archives and their conversion from original to
digital. Part two: The holistic knowledge arsenal of paper-based archives. LIBRES 21 (1).
Retrieved from http://libres-ejournal.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Vol21_I1_
LathamEssOp_LIBRES21n1.pdf
Lee, R.M. (1988). Bureaucracies as deontic systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information
Systems, 6, 87-108.
Lemieux, V.L. (2014). Toward a 'third order' archival interface: Research notes on some
theoretical and practical implications of visual explorations in the Canadian context of
financial electronic records. Archivaria, 78, 53-93.
115