geert-jan van bussel the theoretical framework for the 'archive-as-is'. an organization oriented view on archives - part i Twelve articles use the concepts only to indicate specific information objects ('(personal) health records', 'medical records', 'patient records', 'personal records', 'archives'). Eleven articles use the concepts to indicate aspects of the management of records and archives: 'records management', 'records management systems', 'records management metadata', 'records laws', 'archival finding aids', 'records management strategies', 'record search', and '(functional) records classification'. One article explores the relationship between information culture and records management and offers an interesting theoretical discourse, but it is not meant to be a theoretical framework for records and archives (Sundqvist and Svard, 2016). In the articles analysed, there is only one that offers a theoretical framework, a formal model for digital achives as cultural heritage (Ferro and Silvello, 2013). It is not a full-scale framework for records and archives, but a very useful application of digital library research to archives as cultural heritage. Ferro and Silvello propose a formal model, called NEsted SeTs for Object hieRarchies (NESTOR). The model is used to extend the 5S model, a unified formal theory for Digital Libraries. It allows for a definition of a digital archive as a specific digital library able to cope with the peculiar features of archives (as context and hierarchy) and provides archives with the full wealth of digital library technologies and methods. archives in liquid times Journal Impact Articles (Total) Articles (Concepts mentioned) Articles (frameworks defined) Computer Science MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems 6.984 358 1 (record) 0 Information Systems Research 4.397 408 3 (record) 0 ACM Computing Surveys 3.405 417 0 0 Journal of Management Information Systems 3.036 306 0 0 IEEE Transactions of Industrial Informatics 2.513 1.086 0 0 Information Science Library and Information Science Research 1.629 272 3 (record) 0 Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 1.601 1.340 5 (record, archival finding aid) 0 Information and Organization 1.306 90 1 (record) 0 International Journal of Information Management 1.173 541 9 (record, archives) 0 Information Processing and Management 0.897 501 3 (record, archives) 1 5.319 25 1 100% 0,47 0,0188 Table 1. Analysis of content of applicable top journals 2010-2016 (Scimago Journal and Country Rank (April 26, 2017)) 20 Journal MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems Information Systems Reseach Library and Information Science Research Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology Information Organization International Journal of Information management Article 1. Kohli, R., and S.S.L. Tan (2016). 'Electronic Health Records: How Can IS Researchers Contribute to Transforming Healthcare?', Mis Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 553-573. 2. Ozdemir, Z., J. Barron, and S. Bandyopadhyay (2011). 'An analysis of the adoption of digital health records under switching costs', Information Systems Research, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 491-503. 3. Oborn, E., M. Barrett, M., and E. Davidson (2011). 'Unity in diversity: electronic patient record use in multidisciplinary practice', Information Systems Research, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 547-564. 4. Mishra, A.N., C. Anderson, C.M. Angst, and R. Agarwal (2012). 'Electronic health records assimilation and physician identity evolution: An identity theory perspective', Information Systems Research, No. 3 (part 1), pp. 738-760. 5. Kettunen, K., and P. Henttonen (2010). 'Missing in action? Content of records management metadata in real life', Library information science research, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 43-52. 6. Sinn, D., S.Y. Syn, and S.M. Kim (2011). 'Personal records on the web: Who's in charge of archiving, Hotmail or archivists?', Library Information Science Research, No. 4, pp. 320-330. 7. Oltmann, S.M., E.J. Knox, C. Peterson, and S. Musgrave (2015). 'Using open records laws for research purposes', Library Information Science Research, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 323-328. 8. Nov, O., and W. Schecter (2012). 'Dispositional resistance to change and hospital physicians' use of electronic medical records: A multidimensional perspective', Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 648-656. 9. Steele, R., K. Min, K., and A. Lo (2012). 'Personal health record architectures: technology infrastructure implications and dependencies', Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 1079-1091. 10. Li, T., and T. Slee (2014). 'The effects of information privacy concerns on digitizing personal health records', Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 65, No. 8, pp. 1541-1554. 11. Huvila, I., A. Cajander, M. Daniels, and R.M. Ahlfeldt (2015). 'Patients' perceptions of their medical records from different subject positions', Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 66, No. 12, pp. 2456-2470. 12. Freund, L., E.G. Toms (2015). 'Interacting with archival finding aids', Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 994-1008. 13. Davidson, E. J., C.S. 0sterlund, and M.G. Flaherty (2015). 'Drift and shift in the organizing vision career for personal health records: An investigation of innovation discourse dynamics', Information and Organization, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 191-221. 14. Külcü, and T. Cakmak (2010). 'Evaluation of the ERM application in Turkey within the framework of InterPARES Project', International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 199-211. 15. Xie, S.L. (2013). 'National strategy for digital records: Comparing the approaches of Canada and China', International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 697-701. 16. Shaw, N. (2014). 'The role of the professional association: a grounded theory study of electronic medical records usage in Ontario, Canada', International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 200-209. 17. Asma'Mokhtar, U., and Z.M. Yusof (2015). 'The requirement for developing functional records classification', International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 403-407. 18. Vilar, P., and A. auperl (2015). 'Archives, quo vadis et cum quibus?: Archivists' self-perceptions and perceptions of users of contemporary archives', International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 551-560. 21

Periodiekviewer Koninklijke Vereniging van Archivarissen

Jaarboeken Stichting Archiefpublicaties | 2017 | | pagina 12