archives in liquid times
Foscarini, F. (2012). Diplomatics and genre theory as complementary approaches. Archival
Science, 12.
Furner, J. (2004). Conceptual analysis: A method for understanding information as evidence,
and evidence as information. Archival Science, 4.
Furner, J. (2014). Information without information studies. In F. Ibekwe-SanJuan
T. M. Dousa (Eds.), Theories of information, communication, and knowledge. Studies in history
and philosophy of science 34. DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6973-17.
Gilliland, A. J. (2011). Reflections on the value of metadata archaeology for recordkeeping in
a global, digital world. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 32(1), 97-112.
Gilliland, A. J. (2016). Setting the stage. In M. Baca (Ed.), Introduction to metadata: Pathways
to digital information, (3rd ed.) (pp. 1-20). Los Angeles: Getty Publications. Retrieved from
http://www.getty.edu/publications/intrometadata/setting-the-stage/
Gilliland, A. J., Caswell, M. (2016). Impossible archival imaginaries and imagined records.
Archival Science, 16, 53-75. DOI: 10.1007/s10502-015-9259-z.
Gilliland, A. J., Rouche, N., Evans, J., Lindberg, L. (2005). Towards a twenty-first century
metadata infrastructure supporting the creation, preservation and use of trustworthy records:
Developing the InterPARES2 Metadata Schema Registry. Archival Science, 5, 43-78.
Gilliland-Swetland, A. J. (2000). Enduring paradigm, new opportunities: The value of the archival
perspective in the digital environment. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information
Resources.
Gilliland-Swetland, A. J., Eppard, P. (2000). Preserving the authenticity of contingent digital
objects. DLibMagazine, 6. Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july00/eppard/07eppard.
html
Head, R. C. (Ed.). (2010). Archival science, special issue Interdisciplinary essays on European
knowledge culture, 1400-1900. Archival Science, 10, 3.
Head, R. C. (2016). Historical case studies of pre-modern European archives: A comparative
approach. In A. J. Gilliland, S. McKemmish A. J Lau (Eds.). Research in the Archival Multiverse
(pp. 433-455). Clayton, VIC: Monash University Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.26530/
OAPEN_628143
Hedstrom, M. (1993). Descriptive practices for electronic records: Deciding what is essential
and imagining what is possible. Archivaria, 36, 53-63.
Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biography of things: commodification as process. In
A. Appadurai (Ed.). The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 64-91).
Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
MacLean, M. and Davis, B. H. (Eds.). (1998). Time bits: Managing digital continuity.
Los Angeles: Getty Publications.
MacNeil, H. (2017). Catalogues and the collecting and ordering of knowledge (1): ca. 1550
1750. Archivaria, 82, 27-53.
MacNeil, H. (2016). Contemporary archival diplomatics as a method of inquiry: Lessons
learned from two research projects. In A. J. Gilliland, S. McKemmish A. J Lau (Eds.). Research
in the Archival Multiverse (pp. 724-761). Clayton, VIC: Monash University Publishing.
http://dx.doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_628143
McKemmish, S. (1994). Are records ever actual? In S. McKemmish M. Piggott (Eds.). The
records continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives first fifty years (pp. 187-203). Clayton,
VIC: Ancora Press in association with Australian Archives.
McKemmish, S. (2016). Recordkeeping in the Continuum: An Australian tradition. In
A. J. Gilliland, S. McKemmish A. J Lau (Eds.). Research in the Archival Multiverse (pp. 122
160). Clayton, VIC: Monash University Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.26530/
OAPEN_628143
226
anne j. gilliland 'the wink that's worth a thousand words': a contemplation on
the nature of metadata and metadata practices in the archival world
McKemmish, S. (2005). Traces: Document, record, archive, archives. In S. McKemmish,
M. Piggott, B. Reed, F. Upward (Eds.), Archives: Recordkeeping in society (pp. 1-20). Wagga
Wagga: Charles Sturt University Centre for Information Studies.
McKemmish, S., Acland, G., Ward, N. and Reed, B. (1999). Describing records in context in
the Continuum: The Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Schema. Archivaria, 48, 3-43.
McKemmish, S., Upward, F. H., and Reed, B. (2009). The Record Continuum Model. In
M. J. Bates and M. Niles Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and lnformation sciences, 3d. ed.
(pp. 4447-59). New York: Taylor and Francis.
Portuondo, M. (2009). Secret science: Spanish cosmography and the New World. University of
Chicago Press.
Schellenberg, T. R. (1956). Evidential values: Reasons for test of evidential values. Bulletins of
the National Archives, 8. Washington, DC: The National Archives. Retrieved from https://www.
archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/appraisal-evidential-values.html
Strömberg, JBLD (Trans.). (2010). The earliest predecessors of archival science: Jacob von
Rammingen's two manuals of registry and archival management, printed in 1571Lund: Wallin
Dalholm.
United Nations Advisory Commission for the Co-ordination of Information Systems (ACCIS).
(1990). Management of electronic records: Issues and guidelines. New York: United Nations.
Wallace, D. A. (1995). Managing the present: Metadata as archival description. Archivaria, 39,
11-21.
Wallace, D. A. (1993). Metadata and the archival management of electronic records.
Archivaria, 36, 87-110.
Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority. Westport, CT:
Greenwood.
Wilson, P. (1968). Two kinds of power: An essay on bibliographical control. Berkeley: University of
California Publications: Librarianship, No.5.
Yeo, G. (2012a). The conceptual fonds and the physical collection. Archivaria,73 (Spring),
43-80.
Yeo, G. (2012b). Bringing things together: Aggregate records in a digital age. Archivaria, 74,
43-91.
Yeo, G. (2010). Nothing is the same as something else: Significant properties and notions of identity
and originality. Preprint retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1318039/3Z1318039.pdf
227