alignment with the permanent instability and transformation (in organizational
structures, workflows, information technologies, and societal relations) that we
are experiencing in our information-driven society. RGS and the notion of
intertextuality, with all its nuances, may help develop more flexible, human-centred
approaches to records and archives.
archives in liquid times
Literature
Allen, G. (2011). Intertextuality (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Andersen, J. (2008). The concept of genre in information studies. Annual Review of Information
Science and Technology, 42(1), 339-367.
Andersen, J. (2015). Re-describing knowledge organization: A genre and activity-based view. In
J. Andersen (ed.), Genre theory in information studies (pp. 13-42) Studies in Information, 11,
London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Artemeva, N. (2006). Approaches to learning genres: A bibliographical essay. In N. Artemeva
A. Freedman (Eds.), Rhetorical genre studies and beyond (pp. 9-99). Winnipeg, MB: Inkshed
Publications.
Bazerman, C. (1994). Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In
A. Freedman P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 79-101). London: Taylor
Francis.
Bazerman, C. (2000). Letters and the social grounding of differentiated genres. In D. Barton
N. Hall (Eds.), Letter writing as a social practice (pp. 15-29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chen, Y. (2010). Documenting transitional information in EMR. In J. A. Konstan, E. Chi,
K. Höök (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,
April 10-15, Atlanta, USA (pp. 1787-1796). New York: ACM Press.
Christensen, L.R. (2016). On intertext in chemotherapy: An ethnography of text in medical
practice. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 25, 1-38.
Culler, J. (1982). On deconstruction: Theory and criticism after structuralism. Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
Darwin, C. (1832). Letter to Caroline Darwin, Botafogo Bay, 25-26 April, 1832. Darwin
Correspondence Project, Letter no. 166, retrieved from http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/DCP-
LETT-166
Devitt, A. (1991). Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential, and functional. In C.
Bazerman J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamic of the professions (pp. 336-357). Madison, WI:
University of Wisconsin Press.
Douglas, J. (2010). Origins: Evolving ideas about the principle of provenance. In T. Eastwood
H. MacNeil (Eds.), Currents of archival thinking (pp. 23-43). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries
Unlimited.
Duranti, L. (1997). The archival bond. Archives and Museum Informatics, 11, 213-218.
Duranti, L. (1989). Diplomatics: New uses for an old science. Archivaria, 28(Summer), 7-27.
Duranti, L. (1989-90). Diplomatics: New uses for an old science (Part II). Archivaria,
29(Winter), 4-17.
Flinn, A. (2007). Community histories, community archives: Some opportunities and
challenges. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 28(2), 151-176
Flinn, A. (2008). Other ways of thinking, other ways of being. Documenting the margins and
the transitory: What to preserve, how to collect. In L. Craven (Ed.), What are archivesCultural
and theoretical perspectives (pp. 109-128). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Flinn, A., Stevens, M., Shepherd, E. (2009). 'Whose memories, whose archives? Independent
community archives, autonomy and the mainstream. Archival Science, 9(1-2), 71-86.
192
fiorella foscarini and juan ilerbaig intertextuality in the archives
Foscarini, F. (2012). Diplomatics and genre theory as complementary approaches. Archival
Science, 12(4), 389-409.
Foscarini, F. (2014). A genre-based investigation of workplace communities. Archivaria, 78,
1-24.
Foscarini, F. (2015). Organizational records as genres: An analysis of the 'documentary reality'
of organizations from the perspectives of diplomatics, records management, and rhetorical
genre studies. In J. Andersen (ed.), Genre theory in information studies (pp. 115-32) Studies in
Information 11, London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Ilerbaig, J. (forthcoming). Instruments of recollection: Field notes, place, and memory in the
practice of Darwin's natural history. Unpublished manuscript.
InterPARES. (2001). The Long-term Preservation of Authentic Electronic Records: Findings of the
InterPARESProject. Retrieved from http://interpares.org/book/index.cfm
MacNeil, H. (1992). The context is all: Describing a fonds and its parts in accordance with the
Rules for Archival Description. In T. Eastwood (Ed.), The archival fonds: From theory to practice
(pp. 195-225). Ottawa: Bureau of Canadian Archivists.
MacNeil, H. (2004). Contemporary archival diplomatics as a method of inquiry: Lessons
learned from two research projects. Archival Science, 4, 199-232.
MacNeil, H. (2015). The role of calendars in constructing a community of historical workers
in the Public Records Office of Great Britain ca. 1850s-1950s. In J. Andersen (ed.), Genre theory
in information studies (pp. 91-113) Studies in Information, 11, London: Emerald Group
Publishing Limited.
McKemmish, S. (2005). Traces: Document, record, archive, archives. In S. McKemmish,
M. Piggott, B. Reed, F. Upward (Eds.), Archives: Recordkeeping in society (pp. 1-20). Wagga
Wagga, NSW: Charles Sturt University, Centre for Information Studies.
McKenzie, P.J. Davies, E. (2012). Genre systems and 'keeping track' in everyday life. Archival
Science, 12(4), 437-60.
Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151-167.
Miller, C. (1994). Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. In A. Freedman
P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 57-66). London: Taylor Francis.
Oliver, G. (2008). Information culture: Exploration of different values and attitudes to
information in organisations. Journal of Documentation, 64(3), 363-385.
Oliver, G., Foscarini, F. (2013). Records management and information culture: Tackling the
people problem. London: Facet.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in
organizations." Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427.
0sterlund, C. (2007). Genre combinations: A window into dynamic communication
practices. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 81-108.
0sterlund, C. (2008). Documents in place: Demarcating places for collaboration in
healthcare settings. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 17, 195-225.
Paré, A. (2002). Genre and identity: Individuals, institutions and ideology. In R. Coe,
L. Lingard, T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre: Strategies for stability and
change (pp. 57-71). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Pearce-Moses, R. (2005). A glossary of archival and records terminology. Chicago: The Society of
American Archivists.
Russell, D. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An Activity Theory Analysis.
Written Communication, 14(4), 504-54.
Schryer, C.F. (1994). Records as genre. Written Communication, 10(2), 200-234.
Smart, G. (2006). Writing the economy: Activity, genre and technology in the world of banking.
Oakville, CT: Equinox.
193