geert-jan van bussel the theoretical framework for the 'archive-as-is'
an organization oriented view on archives - part ii
archives in liquid times
Cook, T. (1997). What is past is prologue. A history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future
paradigm shift. Archivaria, 43, 17-63.
Cook, T. (2007). Electronic Records, Paper Minds: the revolution in information management
and archives in the post-custodial and post-modernist era. Archives Social Studies: A Journal of
Interdisciplinary Research, 1, 399-443. (reprint from 1994).
Cox, R.J., H.W. Samuels (1988). The archivist's first responsibility. A research agenda to
improve the identification and retention of records of enduring value. The American Archivist,
51 (Winter/Spring), 28-42.
Cui, Y., J. Widom (2003). Lineage tracing for general data warehouse transformations.
The VLDB Journal - The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases, 12(1), 41-58.
Cunningham, A. (2015). Postcustodialism. In L. Duranti, P.C. Franks (eds.), Encyclopedia of
Archival Science (pp. 274-278). London: Rowman and Littlefield.
Dervin, B. (1997). Given a context by any other name. Methodological tools for taming the
unruly beast. In P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, B. Dervin (eds.), Information seeking in context
(pp. 13-38). London: Taylor Graham.
Dervin, B. (2003). From, the minds eye of the user. The Sense-Making Qualitative-
Quantitative methodology. In B. Dervin and L. Foreman-Wernet (eds.), Sense-Making
Methodology Reader. New York: Hampton Press. (First published in 1992.)
Devlin, K.J. (1991). Oracles in situation semantics. In J. Barwise, J.M. Gawron, G. Plotkin, and
S. Tutiya (eds.), Situation Theory and its Applications, Vol. 2 (Chapter 3, pp. 41-49). Menlo Park:
CLSI.
Devlin, K. (1994). Situation Theory and Social Structure. In M. Masuch and L. Polos (eds.),
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning under Uncertainty (pp. 197-237). Berlin: Springer-
Verlag.
Devlin, K., D. Rosenberg (2008). Information in the study of human interaction. In
J. Van Benthem, P. Adriaans, D.M. Gabbay, P. Thagard, and J. Woods (eds.), Handbook of the
Philosophy of Information (pp. 685-710). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Dewey, J., J. Tufts (1908). Ethics. New York: Henry Holt and Co.
Dollar, C. (1992). Archival theory and information tehnologies. The impact of information
technologies on archival principles and methods. Macerata: University of Macerata.
Downs, A. (1967). Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little-Brown.
Dubnick, M.J., H.G. Frederickson (2011). Public accountability. Performance measurement,
the extended state, and the search for trust. Washington, DC: Kettering Foundation National
Academy of Public Administration.
Duranti, L. (1997a). The preservation of the integrity of electronic records. In Proceedings ofthe
DLM-Forum on electronic records. Brussels, 18-20 December 1996 (pp 60-65). Luxemburg: Office
for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Duranti, L. (1997b). The Archival Bond. Archives Museum Informatics, 11(3-4), 213-218.
Duranti, L. (2007). Archives as a Place. Archives Social Studies: A Journal of Interdisciplinary
Research, 1(0), 445-466. (Reprint of 1996).
El Kharbili, M., S. Stein, I. Markovic, E. Pulvermüller (2008). Towards a framework for
semantic business process compliance management. In S. Sadiq, M. Indulska, and
M. zur Muehlen (eds.), Proceedings ofthe Workshop on Governance, Risk and Compliance for
Information Systems (GRCIS 2008), CEUR, Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 339, Montpellier
(pp. 1-15). Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-339/
Frege, G. (1980). The Foundations of Arithmetic: A Logico-Mathematical Enquiry into the Concept
of Number (translated by J.L. Austin, 2nd ed.). Chicago: Northwestern University Press.
Gilliland, A.J., McKemmish, S., Lau, A.J. (eds.) (2016). Research in the Archival Multiverse.
Clayton, VIC: Monash University Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_628143
66
Göpferich, S. (2006). Comprehensibility assessment using the Karlsruhe Comprehensibility
Concept. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 6(11), 31-53.
Greetham, D. (1999). Who's in, who's out. The cultural politics of archival exclusion. Studies
in the Literary Imagination, 32(1), 1-28.
Griffin, R.W., G. Moorhead (2014). Organizational behavior. Managing people and
organizations (11th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Groth, P.T. (2007). The origin of data. Enabling the determination of provenance in multi-
institutional scientific systems through the documentation of processes. Doctoral thesis at the
University of Southampton. Retrieved from https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/264649/
Hartshorne, C., P. Weiss (1933). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, IV. Boston:
Harvard University Press.
Heidelberg, R.L. (2015). Political accountability and spaces of contestation. Administration
Society, April 14, 1-24.
Hill, H. (2013). Disability and accessibility in the library and information science literature:
A content analysis. Library Information Science Research, 35(2), 137-142.
Hockx-Yu, H. (2006). Digital Preservation in the Context of Institutional Repositories.
Program: Electronic Library Information Systems, 40(3), 232-243.
Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and Organizations: Software ofthe Mind. New York:
McGraw-Hill. (Most recent (third) edition: 2010).
Holsapple, C.W., M. Singh (2001). The knowledge chain model: activities for
competitiveness. Expert Systems with Applications, 20(1), 77-98.
Horsman, P.J. (1994). Taming the elephant. An orthodox approach to the principle of
provenance. In K. Abukhanfusa, J. Sydbeck (eds.), The principle of provenance. First Stockholm
Conference on archival theory and the principal of provenance, 2-3 september 1993, Stockholm
(pp. 51-63).
Horsman, P.J. (1999). Archiefsystemen en kwaliteit. In P.J. Horsman, F.C.J. Ketelaar,
T.H.P.M. Thomassen (eds.), Naar een nieuw paradigma in de archivistiek. Den Haag: SAP.
Horsman, P.J. (2001). Electronic Recordkeeping. The Recordkeeping System as framework for the
management of electronic records. Amsterdam; Archiefschool.
Horsman, P.J., F.C.J. Ketelaar, T.H.P.M. Thomassen (1998). Tekst en context van de
Handleiding voor het ordenen en beschrijven van archieven van 1898. Hilversum: Verloren.
Hurley, C. (1995). Ambient functions: abandoned children to zoos. Archivaria, 40(Fall),
21-39.
Hurley, C. (2005). Parallel provenance [Series of parts]: Part 1: What, if anything, is archival
description? Archives and Manuscripts, 33(1), 110-145.
Ihanus, J. (2007). The archive and psychoanalysis: Memories and histories toward futures.
International Forum of Psychoanalysis. 16(2), 119-131.
Israel, D., J. Perry (1991). Information and architecture. In J. Barwise, J.M. Gawron,
G. Plotkin, and S. Tutiya (eds.), Situation theory and its applications Vol. 2, CSLI Lecture Notes 26
(pp. 147-160). Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI).
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. Cambridge, MA:
The Riverside Press.
James, W. (1909). The meaning of truth. Cambridge, MA: The Riverside Press.
Janis, I. (1972). Victims of Groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and
fiascoes. Boston: Hughton-Mifflin.
Jansen, A. (2015). Chain of Preservation. In L. Duranti, and P.C. Franks (eds.), Encyclopedia of
Archival Science (pp. 133-136). London: Rowman and Littlefield.
Jenkinson, H. (2003). Modern Archives: Some Reflections on T. R. Schellenberg: Modern
Archives. Principles and Techniques. In R.H. Ellis, P. Walne (eds.), Selected writings of Sir
Hilary Jenkinson (pp. 339-342). Chicago: SAA.
67