geert-jan van bussel the theoretical framework for the 'archive-as-is'
an organization oriented view on archives - part i
archives in liquid times
Cook, T. (1992). Mind Over Matter: Towards a New Theory of Archival Appraisal. In B. L. Craig
(ed.), The Archival Imagination. Essays in Honour of Hugh A. Taylor (pp. 38-70). Ottawa: ACA.
Cook, T. (1997). What is past is prologue. A history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future
paradigm shift. Archivaria, 43, 17-63.
Cook, T. (2000a). Fashionable Nonsense or Professional Rebirth: Postmodernism and the
Practice of Archives. Archivaria, 51, 14-35.
Cook, T. (2000b). Beyond the Screen: The Records Continuum and Archival Cultural Heritage.
In L. Burrows (ed.), Beyond the Screen: capturing corporate and social memory (pp. 8-21).
Melbourne: Australian Society of Archivists.
Cook, T. (2001). Archival science and postmodernism. New formulations for old concepts.
Archival Science, 1(1), 3-24.
Cook, T. (2005). Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice: Origins, Characteristics, and
Implementation in Canada, 1950-2000. Archival Science, 5(2-4), 101-161.
Cvetkovich, A. (2003). An archive of feelings. Trauma, sexuality, and lesbian public culture.
Durham: Duke University Press.
Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L. (1997). Information ecology: Mastering the information and
knowledge environment. New York: Oxford University Press.
DeLanda, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity.
New York: Continuum.
Derrida, J. (1995a). Mald'Archive: UneImpressionFreudienne. Paris: Galilée.
Derrida, J. (1995b). Archive Fever. A Freudian impression. Diacritics, 25(2), 9-63.
Dunbar, A.W. (2006). Introducing critical race theory to the archival discourse. Getting
the conversation started. Archival Science, 6(1), 109-129.
Duranti, L. (1994). The concept of appraisal and archival theory. The American Archivist,
57(2), 328-344.
Duranti, L. (1998). Diplomatics. New uses for an old science, Lanham and London:
The Scarecrow Press.
Duranti, L. (2001). The impact of digital technology on archival science. Archival Science, 1,
39-55.
Duranti, L. (2005). The long-term preservation of accurate and authentic digital data:
the INTERPARES project. Data Science Journal, 4, 106-118.
Duranti, L. (2009). From Digital Diplomatics to Digital Records Forensics. Archivaria, 68,
39-66.
Duranti, L. (2010a). Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or
records management theory is archival diplomatics. Records Management Journal, 20(1),
78-95.
Duranti, L. (2010b). Diplomatics. In M.J. Bates and M.N. Maack (eds.), Encyclopedia of library
and information sciences, (3rd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Duranti, L., Jansen, A. (2011). Authenticity of Digital Records. An Archival Diplomatics
framework for Digital Forensics. In W. Castelnova and E. Ferrari (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th
European Conference of Information Management and Evaluation (pp. 134-139). Como:
Academic Publishing Limited.
Evans, J., B. Reed, H. Linger, S. Goss, D. Holmes, J. Dobrik. B. Woodyat, S. Henbest (2014).
Winds of Change. A recordkeeping informatics approach to information management needs
in data-driven research environments. Records Management Journal, 24(3), 205-223.
Faulkhead, S. (2009). Connecting through records: Narratives of Koorie Victoria. Archives and
Manuscripts, 37(2), 60-88.
Ferro, N., G. Silvello (2013). NESTOR: A formal model for digital archives. Information
Processing Management, 49(6), 1206-1240.
36
Foucault, M. (1975). Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1976, 1984). Histoire de la Sexualite', Vol. I (1976), Vol. II-III (1984). Paris:
Gallimard.
Foucault, M. (1992). LArchéologiedusavoir. Paris: Gallimard. (1st ed.: 1969)
Galin, J., J. Latchaw (2001). Theorizing Raw Archive. A new paradigm for academic
scholarship and publication'. In J.F. Barbar and D. Grigar (eds.), New Worlds, New Words:
Exploring Pathways for Writing about and in Electronic Environments (pp. 279-306). Cresskill,
NJ: Hampton Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge
(UK): Polity Press.
Gilliland, A.J., McKemmish, S., Lau, A.J. (eds.) (2016). Research in the Archival Multiverse.
Clayton, VIC: Monash University Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_628143
Greetham, D. (1999). Who's in, who's out. The cultural politics of archival exclusion. Studies
in the Literary Imagination, 32(1), 1-28.
Groth, P.T. (2007). The origin of data. Enabling the determination of provenance in multi-
institutional scientific systems through the documentation of processes. Southampton: University
of Southampton.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science question in feminism and the privilege
of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599.
Harris, V. (2004). Concerned with the writings of others: Archival canons, discourses and
voices. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 25(2), 211-220.
Hausmann, V., S.P. Williams, C.A. Hardy, P. Schubert (2014). Enterprise information
management readiness: A survey of current issues, challenges and strategy. Procedia Technology,
16, 42-51.
Huvila, I. (2008). Participatory archive. Towards decentralised curation, radical user
orientation, and broader contextualization of records management. Archival Science, 8(1),
15-36.
Huyssen, A. (2000). Present Pasts: Media, Politics, Amnesia. Public Culture, 12(1), 21-38.
Ismail, A., A. Jamaludin (2009). Towards establishing a framework for managing trusted
records in the electronic environment. Records Management Journal, 19(2), 135-146.
Jansen, A. (2015). Chain of Preservation. In L. Duranti, P.C. Franks (eds.), Encyclopedia of
Archival Science (pp. 133-136). London: Rowman and Littlefield.
Jeurgens, C. (2014). The target keeps moving. Appraisal in a continuum. Paper presented at the
conference 'Paradigm shift! Shifting minds and practices in record keeping?' (Nationaal
Archief Netherlands, Den Haag, January 2014). Retrieved from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.
nl/bitstream/handle/1887/32027/Jeurgens%20target%20keeps%20moving.def.
pdf?sequence=1
Joyce, P. (1999). The Politics of the Liberal Archive. History oftheHuman Sciences, 12(2), 35-49.
Kaplan, E. (2000). We are what we collect, we collect what we are. Archives and the
construction of identity. The American Archivist, 63, 126-151.
Karabinos, M.J. (2015). The Shadow Continuum. Testing the Records Continuum Model through
the Djogdja documents and the Migrated Archives, Leiden (PhD).
Ketelaar, E. (1999). Archivalisation and archiving. Archives and Manuscripts, 27, 54-61.
Ketelaar, E. (2000a). Archivistics research saving the profession. The American Archivist, 63,
322-340.
Ketelaar, E. (2002). Archival temples, archival prisons. Modes of power and protection.
Archival Science, 2(3-4), 221-238.
Ketelaar, E. (2017). Archival turns and returns. Studies of the Archive. In A.J. Gilliland,
S. McKemmish, A.J. Lau (eds.), Research in the Archival Multiverse (pp. 228-268). Clayton, VIC:
Monash University Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_628143
37